| Quote: |
|
From: Google Enforcement Team <tmdisputes at google dot com> To: me Subject: Unauthorized use of content - Mobile Gmaps Dear Mr. Streng, We understand that you have developed an application, Mobile Gmaps, that displays maps tiles from our Google Maps for mobile application. You probably did this to show support for Google, but this use of our map tiles violates our rights and the rights of the entities that license those map tiles to us. As indicated in the Terms of Service accompanying Google Maps for mobile (http://www.google.com/gmm/tc.html?hl=en), you should not create derivative works, such as your application, without contacting us and obtaining our permission first. Because your use of our content is not authorized, we must ask that you stop displaying maps tiles from Google Maps for mobile in your own application. Please confirm immediately that you will do so. Regards, Google Enforcement Team |
| mwice wrote: |
| Argh !!!! Thats a sad day.
I dont think any of another map providers have at least near Russia maps quality Cristian... Please comment, what exactly you going to remove. I think generic MGMapsCache dir with Map1_zoom0 Map1_zoom1 Map2_zoom0 Map2_zoom1 etc catalogs remove responsibility from you about which tiles user will put there... ? So MGMaps can scan cache dir for dir names and show Map1 Map2 in maps selection... I understand what you have to remove direct online google map support, but please think how to leave us a chance to use offline google maps. Edit: and what about programm name ? It means Google however... |
| Quote: |
|
As indicated in the Terms of Service accompanying Google Maps for mobile (http://www.google.com/gmm/tc.html?hl=en), you should not create derivative works, such as your application, without contacting us and obtaining our permission first. |
| RangerRick wrote: | ||
Silly question, but didn't your app exist before they had a mobile app? If I recall correctly, you had created it when there was only the google maps web site... Wouldn't that mean it is not a derivative work? To be a derivative, I would think you would have to derive it from theirs. |
| Quote: |
|
Dear Mr. Streng, The API license only applies if you use our API. As we understand it, you are taking and displaying our raw map tiles, which we do not authorize anyone to do. You are also creating a derivative work which very closely resembles our own mobile mapping application and using our trademarks without prior permission or a license, which again is not allowed. Please confirm that you will stop displaying our map tiles and/or stop distributing your application which contains those map tiles. Regards, Google Enforcement Team |
| Cristian Streng wrote: | ||
|
| Quote: |
| The API license only applies if you use our API. |
| Quote: |
| You are also creating a derivative work which
very closely resembles our own mobile mapping application |
| Quote: |
| and using our trademarks without prior permission or a license, which again is not allowed. |
| RangerRick wrote: | ||
Technically they're creating a work that resembles yours. |
| mwice wrote: |
| By the way... what is their API ? Some javascript ? Is there are some way to use it in programms not on wed ? |
| mwice wrote: |
| And question i forgot to ask.. what will happen with www.gmap-track.com ? I guess it use API ? |
| adszhu wrote: |
| Crisitian, I am awfully sorry to hear the news. I wonder what the reasons are behind. Maybe its time for GMM to support GPS, but I am not sure if the presence of MGMaps is against it, by any meaning...
I do believe in MGMaps and keep an eye on your RSS Ádám |
| steeven wrote: |
| is it possible to ask google to relase a licnese for mgmaps? |
| spadival wrote: |
| I think it took some time for Google Enforcement Team to wake up !! If anything, I feel this is gonna make Mgmaps more popular without crippling its functionality. |
| spadival wrote: |
| Have they said anything about using Google search/routing from mgmaps? |
output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT